Cosmological arguments from contingency attempt to show that there is a necessarily existing godlike being on the basis of the fact that any concrete things exist at all. Couldnt the cause of the universe be a finite, random, and impersonal cause. A description of the cosmological argument supporting the existence of god. Various criticisms purporting to show clarkes argument unsound rowe submits to probing analyses and finally assesses as failures. Oxford university press usa publishes scholarly works in all academic disciplines, bibles, music, childrens books, business books, dictionaries, reference books, journals, text books and more. Thomas aquinas 1225 march 7, 1274 is the idea that philosophy can help us come to a better understanding of theology the study of god. But even if we accept this argument, does it prove the existence of the god of religion, a being who is infinite, intelligent, benevolent, and purposeful. The first part is an argument to establish the existence of a necessary being. An a posteriori argument because it begins with a premise, based on observation, that the universe exists, and is subject to change. Rowe has called the principle the humeedwards principle. Rowes cosmological argument essay example topics and well. The cosmological argument therefore argues for the existence of god a posteriori based on the apparent order in the universe. The cosmological argument in its historically most influential versions is not concerned to show that there is a cause of things which just happens not to have a cause. Rs religious studies revision section on covering aquinas, first way, second way, criticisms of the first and second ways, third way, criticisms of the third way and humes criticisms of the cosmological argument, existence of god,philosophy of religion.
Although the premises of flews argument are not inconsistent with the principle of sufficient reason they do have serious implications for the cosmological argument. It tries to show that for this to be so there must exist something outside the universe which can cause or explain its existence. An examination of the cosmological argument william rowe brief biographical remarks about william rowe appear before selection i. The second part is an argument to establish that this necessary being is god. According to rowe, we can allow someone to define god anyway he or she wants, yet it will not follow from that definition that such a being. The cosmological argument attempts to prove gods existence by observing the world around us the cosmos. By the cosmological argument i mean to refer to samuel clarkes argument that there must be a necessarily existent being who is the cause of the existence of contingent beings. This is in contrast to the ontological argument, which makes no use of evidence from the world, but argues by way of analysis from the concept of a supreme perfect being. The cosmological argument itself, however, cannot be regarded as a proof for the existence of a logically necessary being, since its premises either express or rest on the psr, whose truth value is at best unknown.
It is unclear, however, whether the second contention is an essential part of the cosmological argument. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves. For the point of the cosmological argument is to show that there must be a stopping place to the series of explanations. In chapter ii of william rowe s the cosmological argument, rowe presents samuel clarkes argument for the conclusion that something has existed from eternity as follows 1. Rowe on the cosmological argument clement dore vanderbilt university in his recent book, philosophy of religion, an introduction, william l. Cosmological argument these keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. In the present selection, taken from the second edition of his philosophy of religion. The term cosmological argument refers to the procedure of arguing from the cosmosworld, to the existence of god. The cosmological argument is less a particular argument than an argument type.
A critical assessment of contemporary cosmological arguments. The fact that the universe exists means that somebody must have created it in the first place, and this somebody is most likely god. The principle of sufficient reason is likewise employed by samuel clarke in his cosmological argument rowe 1975. The cosmological argument is discussed which attempts to prove that god exists by showing that there cannot be an infinite number of regressions of causes to things that exist. Cosmological argument stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Cosmological argument which relies on a moment of creation. Oct 07, 2012 in chapter ii of william rowes the cosmological argument, rowe presents samuel clarkes argument for the conclusion that something has existed from eternity as follows. They therefore are capable of either being or not being. Pdf insufficient reason in the new cosmological argument. This means that the existence of all beings, and to a great extension, the whole universe, is fully accounted for. The firstcause argument begins with the fact that there is change in the world, and a change is. This argument is made by samuel clarke 1675 1729 an enblish clergyman and philosopher. Rowe begins an interesting paper on the cosmological argument by stating that his purpose is not to resurrect it but to uncover, clarify, and examine some of the philosophical concepts and theses essential to the reasoning exhibited in the argument. I require two axioms that combine modality and mereology.
Sep the cosmological argument introduction to philosophy. He was the first to modernize the cosmological argument, his version of it was defended by william rowe. The cosmological argument and the principle of sufficient. Categories cosmological arguments for theism in philosophy of religion. The cosmological argument kenneth chi 20 throughout history, many philosophers have attempted to formulate arguments for the existence of god. Rowe suggests that the cosmological argument has two parts, one to establish the existence of a first cause or necessary being, the other that this necessary being is god 1975.
Similarly, michael martin reasons t hat no current version of the. Thomas aquinas central to thomism the life work of st. Epistemological foundations for the cosmological argument. If something now exists and it is not the case that something has always existed then something has been produced out of nothing. I think rowe s exposition and analysis of clarkes version of the cosmological argument is wonderful. Every being is either dependent or selfexistent independent. Background overview objections overview i background overview objections 1 against the argument from sucient reason 2 against the third way summary mackie. But time is a relative measure of the rate of change between entities, not an absolute linear constant. Cosmological arguments can be conveniently grouped into three basic types. The notion that infinity is impossible is at the foundation of the cosmological argument, since it means that there must have been a moment of creation which has to be accounted for, a prime mover or prime cause must therefore have caused the universe.
Rowe writes as follows about the cosmological argument and its central premiss, the principle of sufficient reason psr. Rowe argues, aquinas is limiting himself to a specific. Cosmological arguments from contingency request pdf. I the other philosophical argument o ered in defense of premise 2 is that there cannot be an actual in nite in the world, merely a potential in nite. Axiom 4 asserts mereological essentialism with respect to situations. It is a contradiction of the concept of time to speak of a time before time. Rowe has provided responses to skeptical theism, one of which is that on this. Rowe concentrates on the first part of the argument. The cosmological argument or first cause argument is a philosophical argument for the existence of god which explains that everything has a cause, that there must have been a first cause, and that this first cause was itself uncaused.
Rowe argues that there are three ways of explaining the existence of a being. The one minute case against the cosmological argument. A cosmological argument, in natural theology and natural philosophy not cosmology, is an argument in which the existence of a unique being, generally seen as some kind of god, is deduced or inferred from facts or alleged facts concerning causation, change, motion, contingency, or finitude in respect of the universe as a whole or processes within it. Edwards, and i will follow william rowe 2 in calling it the humeedwards. The cosmological argument1 religious studies cambridge. A cosmological argument, in natural theology and natural philosophy not cosmology, is an. Cosmological argument, form of argument used in natural theology to prove the existence of god. According to aquinas, it is an observed fact that some things have a beginning and an ending. Psr had been laid out already in rowes 1968, 1970, 1971 earlier ariicles that later evolved into his own book on the. I completely agree with the views of the cosmological argument presented by rowe. Though i think certain pieces are a bit dated as is the case when the field responds to to such a work, there are still key points that are valuable in current debates of perhaps the most philosophically interesting version of this type of argument which are not emphasized enough.
One of the oldest is the cosmological argument, developed by christian, jewish and islamic thinkers over centuries. What is the cosmological argument for the existence of god. Rowe addresses versions of the cosmological argument from aquinas, scotus and clarke, but focuses on the argument from clarke. The cosmological argument was first proposed by st thomas aquinas, a great christian thinker one his five proofs for the existence of god the universe exists. On pages 120121 of his book, the cosmological argument which presents a more detailed discussion of the argument than does his philosophy of religion, rowe quotes. May 23, 2007 the cosmological argument defines universe as the set of events since creation, and places the first cause beyond our timeline. Philosophy of religion internet encyclopedia of philosophy.
Possibly, then, the theist is entitled to claim that the cosmological argument is an acceptable argument for theistic belief, that it shows the reasonableness of belief in god, even though it does not demonstrate the existence of god rowe. Jul 14, 2015 the argument is a posteriori based on experience, inductive probabilistic and synthetic requiring evidence, not purely logical. So you think you understand the cosmological argument. Thomas aquinas, in his summa theologiae, presented two versions of the cosmological argument. Perhaps the first cosmological argument was that of the ancient greek philosopher aristotle, who claimed that there must be a prime mover the original source of motion in our world. Rowe didnt agree that the argument proves its conclusion because the principle of sufficient reason cant be proved. The cosmological argument for god concludes that there is a first cause that explains why the universe exists. Pdf in a recent article in this journal, richard gale and alexander pruss offer a new cosmological proof for the existence of god relying only. The cosmological argument1 volume 11 issue 4 pheroze s. It is not interested in brute facts if it were, then yes, positing the world as the ultimate brute fact might arguably be as defensible as taking god to be. In the light of this principle, he examines the argument itself and four objections to it. Project muse the cosmological argument by william l. Why, according to rowe, do the proponents of the cosmological argument think that 3 follows from 1 and 2.
255 359 1060 518 219 1014 623 523 1313 1181 780 329 151 240 624 462 1286 1372 273 725 776 1114 957 461 929 713 499 172 779 1420 33 662 1069 407 400 104 112 1251 415 711 542 105